It looks like the 1.17 binary for 64-bit linux requires glibc 2.4, which isn't available on Centos6. Centos 6 uses 2.12.
Could you provide a static binary possibly? Or include the dylibs in your deliverable?
Please advise.
Thanks!
Alan
linux 64-bit 1.17 doesn't work on CentOS 6
-
-
I'm also in this situation and could really use static binaries.
-
Likewise, I am on a RackSpace server running Redhat 6 which has GLIBC 2.12 and the hosting company doesn't want to upgrade this as 2.12 is apparently still the version being issued by Redhat themselves.
David
-
I really need an answer to this! The hosting company say that they can't upgrade the server from GLIBC 2.12 to anything later. Is there a workaround? Does krpanotools actually need anything from GLIBC that's only in the versions later than 2.12? This is a showstopper as far as I am concerned.
-
Hi,
I'm already planing to make a special build (command line tools only) for older Linux systems, but this will need some time. A lot of code need to be rewritten to be compilable there and the priority for this very special need can't be the very highest one of course.
Best regards,
Klaus -
Please see here for a test version with GLIBC 2.4 as minium:
Linux Krpanotools not working with glib 2.5?
Participate now!
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!