Choosing the size of the cube faces

  • Hi krpano enthusiasts,

    Given my 16384x8192 equirectangular images to krpano normal vtour droplet generates cube faces of size 2048x2048 (for non mobile). However, I'm not satisfied with the resulting quality of the pano: I want more pixels! So, I used sphere2cube to generate cube faces with higher number of pixel. I'm struggling on striving a tradeoff between quality of the image and waiting time to download the file for the average user. For instance, choosing tiles of 4096x4096 is too expensive.

    Also, a multiresolution solution cannot be used for my specific case.

    Do you have any recommendation/suggestion for the number of pixels that I should choose? For instance, should it be better to have a number which is the sum of power of two (eg 2^11+2^10 or 2^11+2^9)


    Thanks.

Jetzt mitmachen!

Sie haben noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registrieren Sie sich kostenlos und nehmen Sie an unserer Community teil!