Sie sind nicht angemeldet.

which is faster and easiser to use ?

booghy08

Anfänger

  • »booghy08« ist der Autor dieses Themas

Beiträge: 37

Wohnort: Romania

Beruf: Virtual Tours

  • Nachricht senden

1

Sonntag, 7. Februar 2010, 12:57

which is faster and easiser to use ?

sorry but i didn't know where to put this Thread.
is it best to create
option 1 a virtual tour that containes one XML with multiple scenes or
option 2 every pano included in the virtual tour should have it's own XML file.
i'm talking about how fast it loads the pano and plugin interaction

Thank you

dav34

Schüler

Beiträge: 57

  • Nachricht senden

2

Sonntag, 7. Februar 2010, 20:56

İf you have a ton of panos the solution of on main xml calling the different xml is clearly faster (you don't load unneeded datas). But for me the scene approach is cleaner than the other method.

I advice you to test the two on the slower PC that you can access and you will see that the performance difference is very low.

Bye,
David
Istanbul virtual tour creation : www.vizyon360.com

klaus.krpano

Administrator

Beiträge: 13 499

  • Nachricht senden

3

Dienstag, 9. Februar 2010, 13:10

Hi,

from performance side, there should be near no or no difference,

more xml files are needing more download requests, but the xml files
are mostly small and that shouldn't make much difference in loading time,

from the pano loading and rendering performance side it don't care,

best regards,
Klaus

pavka

Anfänger

Beiträge: 17

  • Nachricht senden

4

Sonntag, 7. März 2010, 00:05

what about ...

What about this:

http://www.wkraj.pl/index.php?page=vr&start=38148

when you move cursor there is "blur disabled" smth like that and its a lot faster when moving... when mouse stops moving pano its back to normal quality. How it is made?
Btw it is krpano right?

Ähnliche Themen