You are not logged in.



  • "booghy08" started this thread

Posts: 37

Location: Romania

Occupation: Virtual Tours

  • Send private message


Sunday, February 7th 2010, 12:57pm

which is faster and easiser to use ?

sorry but i didn't know where to put this Thread.
is it best to create
option 1 a virtual tour that containes one XML with multiple scenes or
option 2 every pano included in the virtual tour should have it's own XML file.
i'm talking about how fast it loads the pano and plugin interaction

Thank you


Sunday, February 7th 2010, 8:56pm

İf you have a ton of panos the solution of on main xml calling the different xml is clearly faster (you don't load unneeded datas). But for me the scene approach is cleaner than the other method.

I advice you to test the two on the slower PC that you can access and you will see that the performance difference is very low.

Istanbul virtual tour creation :


Tuesday, February 9th 2010, 1:10pm


from performance side, there should be near no or no difference,

more xml files are needing more download requests, but the xml files
are mostly small and that shouldn't make much difference in loading time,

from the pano loading and rendering performance side it don't care,

best regards,


Sunday, March 7th 2010, 12:05am

what about ...

What about this:

when you move cursor there is "blur disabled" smth like that and its a lot faster when moving... when mouse stops moving pano its back to normal quality. How it is made?
Btw it is krpano right?

Similar threads