Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 1 mal editiert, zuletzt von »AKSAN Bros« (28. März 2012, 19:44)
Thank you and all others for your support!
Zitat
You have our support Klaus - good luck.
Before releasing I already thought about encrypting the swf (btw - I could use the already available krpano encryption system for that, that would be even more safe then any swf obfuscation
Zitat
Consider using secureSWF for obfuscating the most important parts of your plugins. You have the full control on obfuscation with this software and can even obfuscate individual classes and functions.
) - BUT - see my post from above: The plugins itself are unprotected because I have no big problem when someone is privately looking at the sources to understand how krpano is working or as inspiration for own plugins. - I never thought that someone will really do an almost 1:1 copy of the code!Good to know!
Zitat
We've stopped the download of last update of Tourweaver and removed all the related subjects immediately after I've received the feedbacks and investigated into the issue.
That's not true and a bare lie from your developers!
Zitat
Our developers responsible for Bing Map have admitted that they had copied THREE TOOLS (PositionControl, ZoomControl and MaptypeControl) of Bing Map Plugin of Krpano but all others are sole Easypano's.
. I think your developers don't understand what I was doing there and just kept these parts to make sure that there is no problem or so
.Okay, but I hope this time without any krpano code. I would recommend to delete and FORGET really EVERYTHING that was copied, including the "Map" and "LatLng" classes and start over again! Finding out all the small details about the OpenScales usage needs intensive studding of the OpenScales sources (which are well written and easy to understand btw!). The so resulting code can never look the same!
Zitat
Easypano will release another update supporting Bing Map and open its source code for your review in a few days.
Again - that's not correct - the whole "Map" class is also almost an 1:1 copy from the krpano Bing Maps Plugin! The only added thing was the TWCustomMarker class and the Polygon 'addFeature' for your radar.
Zitat
To further explain in details, I need to quote what one of our developers says:
"It is the fact that we've quoted some codes for Bing Map in last update of Tourweaver. They are MapTypeControl class, PositionControl class, ZoomControl class, as well as codes related to these three classes, such as functions get_zoom_from_bing_resolution and get_bing_resolution related to ZoomControl class.
It's not an 'approximate' relationship, it's the 'exact' relationship
Zitat
The fomula Klaus mentions 22 - (4.7438 + 2 * (Math.log(res) * Math.LOG10E) / (Math.log(4) * Math.LOG10E)), and Math.pow(10, (22 - 4.7438 - zoom) * (Math.log(4) * Math.LOG10E) is mainly the approximate relationship between zoom level and resolution in ZoomControl class.
.
Zitat
When the value of resolution is 1.2, it is at the level between 17 and 18. What's more, the valid levels are 1-17 even though the returned JSON data "zoomMax":21,"zoomMin":1 from MS Bing Map, so it should be ok to modify the response method (zoomin and zoomout) in org.openscales.core.Map class, no need of such complicated formula."
These two statements only show that you luckily wasn't able to copy or understand all of the krpano code
Zitat
We've found when we roll to the highest leverl with mouse, the Bing Map won't show up but a white screen.
. In fact in the krpano Bing Maps Plugin you can zoom beyond level 17 and even more. And also using fractional zoom levels were possible (but disabled for Google Maps compatibility) by using that formula.Okay, yes, please do that (and remove also the Map and LatLag classes) and develop everything from ground up by your own (without using the krpano sources!) - and all will be okay! I have no problem when someone is basically doing the same but just copying the code and its functionality is definitely not okay!
Zitat
"We will remove all the codes quoted from Krpano Bing Map Plugin."


I have been working for 3 years in china doing virtual tours. I have to admit that I feel the concept of copyright is quiet exotic in this country, this is a problem, and unfair to western companies. However, please keep in mind there are lots of chinese company and photographers using krpano and reading this forum. I hope that those who bought their own copy of krpano will not feel offended by your comment.Why I´m not suprised...
These Chinesee![]()
I have been working for 3 years in china doing virtual tours. I have to admit that I feel the concept of copyright is quiet exotic in this country, this is a problem, and unfair to western companies. However, please keep in mind there are lots of chinese company and photographers using krpano and reading this forum. I hope that those who bought their own copy of krpano will not feel offended by your comment.Why I´m not suprised...
These Chinesee![]()
I have been working for 3 years in china doing virtual tours. I have to admit that I feel the concept of copyright is quiet exotic in this country, this is a problem, and unfair to western companies. However, please keep in mind there are lots of chinese company and photographers using krpano and reading this forum. I hope that those who bought their own copy of krpano will not feel offended by your comment.Why I´m not suprised...
These Chinesee![]()
If somebody is a thief, he should be named as a thief. Of course, there are hundreds of milions good people in China, without a doubt. However it is China, which is famous by copying almost everything in the world from the nails to sofisticated weapon systems.
Look just for example here: http://www.dealextreme.com/ U can find hundreds of copies of well known western products for few bucks. U can even find videos on Youtube of their "copies" of BMW X5, Passat, different Mercedes cars... Everybody knows that and everybody knows that it is a problem. Is it an offence to name it "stealing", if it is really stealing?
This is not only the offence to the "western companies" - I am sure, that to steal the car is not ok even in China. Your property is your property, whether it is a house, car, photography or a software. Anybody, who steals your car is a thief. The same for your photography and the same for your software or code. Is it a big problem for some of them to understand this simple thing? They are very intelligent. They exactly know, what they are doing. And this is supported or at least tolerated by their government/law.
Still I am sure, that I can find plenty of gentlemen in China...
how can i stop supporting EP when they make it very easy to do a virtual tours that even my 5 years old kid can do an attractive virtual tour in five minutes!Stop supporting EP products!
Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 3 mal editiert, zuletzt von »kanzonet« (29. März 2012, 18:01)
I have tested actually kolor Products and many of vertual tours software, i even test krpano (they are all very good) but the best for me is easypano. (i hope that does not bother you what is the best for me, since it does not bother me what is the best for you!)you could try Panotour Prohow can i stop supporting EP when they make it very easy to do a virtual tours that even my 5 years old kid can do an attractive virtual tour in five minutes!![]()
Feel free using that product which is best for you and your development skills. But please don't close your eyes to ignore Easypano's steal of plugin code from Klaus. That's really not a trivial offence specially for a 'world's leading' software company like Easypano.I have tested actually kolor Products and many of vertual tours software, i even test krpano (they are all very good) but the best for me is easypano. (i hope that does not bother you what is the best for me, since it does not bother me what is the best for you!)
ThankYou.
Hiquote
... I think I own you a cup of coffee.... Yours Sincerely ... I hope we can create a fair competition world ...
unquote
... wow ... a cup of coffee looks generous ... and hope is just a dream ....