You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to krpano.com Forum. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

1

Monday, August 20th 2012, 1:08pm

1.8.0.15 tools much slower?

Hi,

Just downloaded the last tools release and it appears all tools are very much slower than the previous version.

Running on OSX Lion.

if i run previous version again it still run fast.

any idea?

2

Monday, August 20th 2012, 1:45pm

Hi,

hmm... there were no changes that could explain a 'much slower' working...

Can you please describe your test scenario?
- 32 or 64bit version?
- size of the input image?
- installed Ram?
- free Ram when starting the tool?

Note - the krpano tools are only using the currently free available ram and when not enough
ram is available then they will start swapping memory to disk - and this is extremely slow, compared to normal working.
Maybe in your test this was the reason for the performance difference...?

Best regards,
Klaus

3

Monday, August 20th 2012, 2:45pm

tif file is 220mb
64 bit version
10gb ram installed


i drag the tif file over makevtour droplet first in 1.8.0.15 folder, takes 6,20 min to process the file.

20 seconds for the 1.8.0.14 version tested just after

4

Monday, August 20th 2012, 3:03pm

What image type? (sphere, cubical, flat) and what pixel dimension? (or fov) does the image have?

Maybe it's the sphere/cylinder to cube conversion which makes the difference...?
The default limit settings when converting a sphere to a cube were reduced in the 1.0.8.15 version (from 360x120 to 360x45).

Best regards,
Klaus

5

Monday, August 20th 2012, 3:08pm

yes!

changing 360*45 to 360*120 the limit in config file and its fast again :)

image was spherical to cube

thanks!

pdxvr

Beginner

Posts: 14

Location: Portland

  • Send private message

6

Wednesday, January 30th 2013, 1:20am

Now what would make it really slow on one image 8200x4100 (15 minutes plus) and then just take seconds on the next of the same size/settings?

7

Wednesday, January 30th 2013, 6:16pm

hi

found out that mac OS Lion has memory management problems.

a simple "purge" command and the job is done faster again.

regards

pdxvr

Beginner

Posts: 14

Location: Portland

  • Send private message

8

Friday, February 1st 2013, 9:44am

Thanks, I'll try that.