It was more an example of how in a discipline like archaeology or cultural heritage, if you will, panoramas and photogrammetry are tools that have very different applications and target audiences.
A highly detailed spacial 3D model would be great for research purposes, but less suitable for general publication. The extra features it packs does not add that much more value compared to the effort in producing such a data set. The spherical panorama however is a perfect medium on which to quickly and easily project layers of information for publicity and education purposes.
The original comment was about cave paintings, and how a spacial model would be nice to use in KRpano, but without asking the question "what is the purpose and who is the audience?", in archaeological terms, the added value of such an application is questionable.