I agree.
I tried to create directional scene blend: https://virtuele-tours.nl/tour/transition/ (XML).
It kind of works, but there's a hiccup when loadscene() kicks in, which breaks the smoothness of the transition.
maybe the hiccup can be fixed? isnt it just a matter of transition times?
, I have lost a second significant customer to a solution that starts with M and ends in PORT. Purely down to the fact, and I quote the customer "it looks nice".Dieser Beitrag wurde bereits 4 mal editiert, zuletzt von »indexofrefraction« (1. August 2018, 17:24)
I appreciate the tech is different but other platforms go someway to replicate it and 360gradenfotografie has made efforts to do the same with some success.mport is a completely different technology,
i wouldn't wait for krpano to go that way anytime soon.
Don't particularly want to commit to the Matterport ecosystem due to the cost and ongoing charges, but I never say never....why dont offer both ways to your clients?
(never forget: always say yes, absolutely no problem, i can do that for you) ;)
Yes there is no scope to go beyond what Matterport (the company) will allow you to do, unlike KRPano.mport only works for real sites you have to photograph, i guess
also programming / designing a tour will be limited much more than krpano
But, I want KRPano always to be better!for some projects mport and for some krpano will be better