which is faster and easiser to use ?

    sorry but i didn't know where to put this Thread.
    is it best to create
    option 1 a virtual tour that containes one XML with multiple scenes or
    option 2 every pano included in the virtual tour should have it's own XML file.
    i'm talking about how fast it loads the pano and plugin interaction

    Thank you

    İf you have a ton of panos the solution of on main xml calling the different xml is clearly faster (you don't load unneeded datas). But for me the scene approach is cleaner than the other method.

    I advice you to test the two on the slower PC that you can access and you will see that the performance difference is very low.

    Bye,
    David

    Hi,

    from performance side, there should be near no or no difference,

    more xml files are needing more download requests, but the xml files
    are mostly small and that shouldn't make much difference in loading time,

    from the pano loading and rendering performance side it don't care,

    best regards,
    Klaus

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

Register Yourself Login