Sie sind nicht angemeldet.

standalone vs. HTML browser. speed.

zackyd

Anfänger

  • »zackyd« ist der Autor dieses Themas

Beiträge: 42

  • Nachricht senden

1

Montag, 27. Februar 2012, 01:11

standalone vs. HTML browser. speed.

When i want the fasted presentation of a tiled image shown locally should i be using a stand alone app or browser?

HansNyb

Profi

Beiträge: 1 063

Wohnort: Denmark

Beruf: Photographer

  • Nachricht senden

2

Montag, 27. Februar 2012, 10:39

It just takes 30 seconds to generate a standalone and test it.

From my test the standalone opens much faster than the fastest browser Safari on my 27"

The pano was a 5 level pano with max 8192 pixels cubefaces.
However flashversion may also affect it. I can see that my standalone was a Flash 10.1 and I have Flash 11 as browser plugin.

Browser speed is very different.
Safari is much faster than Firefox and also slightly faster than Chrome.

Hans

HansNyb

Profi

Beiträge: 1 063

Wohnort: Denmark

Beruf: Photographer

  • Nachricht senden

3

Montag, 27. Februar 2012, 10:57

Actually this generates another question to Klaus.

The last Protect tool on Mac generates a Flash 10.1.85.3 standalone app.

However I had a 10.2.159.1 in my Application folder.
Updating it to an 11.1 did not make any difference.

Apparently the Protect tool has a built in generator which is old.

Hans

HansNyb

Profi

Beiträge: 1 063

Wohnort: Denmark

Beruf: Photographer

  • Nachricht senden

4

Montag, 27. Februar 2012, 14:56

Just discovered that there is a new update which now uses Flash 11 standalone out put.
http://krpano.com/news/#2012-02-20

Hans

zackyd

Anfänger

  • »zackyd« ist der Autor dieses Themas

Beiträge: 42

  • Nachricht senden

5

Dienstag, 28. Februar 2012, 00:33

I did test it but i seem to get the oposite effects. Standalone has lag and the cursor will lag behind as well. I would expect a stand alone to function faster but it does not appear that is so.

Ähnliche Themen