Dear visitor, welcome to krpano.com Forum. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Location: Netherlands
Occupation: Krpano custom coding / Virtual Tours / Photography / Musician / Recording engineer
hi!Hi,
did you make photoshop large file?? why can't you stich ...4GB+ in tiffs??
put whole pano in teh sphere to cube droplet and then all the cube parts at once in the multi res droplet..
That will do ... i think.
Cheers
Tuur![]()
![]() |
Source code |
1 |
kmaketiles tiles_%v_%u.tif singleimage.tif 0 -insize=55500x27500 -intilesize=1000x1000 -inindexbase=1 -tiffcompress=zip -tiffnoalpha |
it's planned, but it can still take some time...
Quoted
and the .psb files are also not supported. aren't they?
Hi,
55000x27500 is not "that" large![]()
ok, this will give me another set of tiles.
you could try to combine the tiles into one image with the kmaketiles tool
and then use the ktransform tool on it,
e.g.
![]()
Source code
1 kmaketiles tiles_%v_%u.tif singleimage.tif 0 -insize=55500x27500 -intilesize=1000x1000 -inindexbase=1 -tiffcompress=zip -tiffnoalpha
(where -intilesize=1000x1000 defines the size of the input tiles)
with the usage of ZIP as compression and the removing of an potential alpha channel (-tiffnoalpha)
it could be possible to keep the tiff file size below 4 GB.
no, the kmaketiles tool can also be used to join a set of tilesok, this will give me another set of tiles.
yes, a cubical pano will be better,
Quoted
so i think that is this case the cube pano will get me more quality.
bwt, what are the pros and cons of sphere representation of panorama? i can see just significant quality reduction at the zenith *sad*
ok, i'll try this way. thanks!no, the kmaketiles tool can also be used to join a set of tilesok, this will give me another set of tiles.
and then to use this single image for the ktransform tool
increasing the "details" parameter significantly slown down rendering speed on my q9600. it is pretty fast with 16 but slows down at 32. at 40 it is looks like turn-based strategyyes, a cubical pano will be better,
Quoted
so i think that is this case the cube pano will get me more quality.
bwt, what are the pros and cons of sphere representation of panorama? i can see just significant quality reduction at the zenith![]()
a sphere has curved surface which can be only approximated with linear elements,
cubes have linear faces which which can be drawn correctly (provided that Flash10 and krpano 1.0.8 are used)
(a other note - you could also try a higher details value then 32, e.g. 40, but I would recommend trying
to convert it to cube)
yes, more details is more work for the flash renderer and will slow it down (especially the flash10 one)increasing the "details" parameter significantly slown down rendering speed on my q9600. it is pretty fast with 16 but slows down at 32. at 40 it is looks like turn-based strategy *blink*
yes, maybe in one of the next versions
Quoted
is it possible to implement feature "get cube multires pano from tiles"? that would be great for me *rolleyes*
Location: Netherlands
Occupation: Krpano custom coding / Virtual Tours / Photography / Musician / Recording engineer