krpano 1.0.8 beta 7

Hi.

Quote from totaln00ber

Would like to know the answer to this question as well. Because it is A LOT of work to convert our current multiple XML virtual tours over to scenes using just one XML file with all the panoramas included.

And would the performance be better and faster to put entire tours in ONE scene ?

So to convert or not to convert, that is the question.

using scenes is just a new more possibility
there is no performance advantage or disadvantage,

it can be used for tours for example to have all in one place
and make the linking between the panos more clear,

Quote from VN2009

the question to me is. will krprotet ever be able to encrypt multilple xml's or is this the solution using scenes? if in the future we can encrypt all xmls i myself will not be converting my finished work into scene's. however is that is not going to happen and the scene is the fix because we cannot excrypt multiple xmls then we all better start converting if we want to protect our work.

the current beta 7 kprotect tool is already able to embed multilple xml's,
encrypting of external files will come with the next beta,

Quote from pacolo

And my question. Is Highsharp changed or lost in this beta 7?.
Also, I was testing beta 6 and it seemed that after change from a initial view with HIGHSHARP to full screen view, mode is changed from HIGHSHARP to HIGH, and when I come back to normal view mode keeps HIGH.
I don't know if I am crazy.

I know that Flash sometimes doesn't apply the sharpen filter for some time, but I don't why yet...
especially in Flash10 and im fullscreen mode, it seems to be a flash issue, but I will try to find something...

Quote from flash360

KLAUS - I don`t think scenes work with krprotect?????

scenes should work also with tool kprotect, there is no reason why not...

here some notes about thhe current kprotect tool (beta7):

NOTE 1 - the kprotect tool parses the embedded xml files and tries to find all
references to external files and embeddeds them also, but it's not always possible
to find all files, then the missing files must be added manually with the "Add File(s)" Button,

NOTE 2 - tiled and multiresolution images are not automatically embedded,
but it's also possible to add the tiles manually,

Quote from spacerywitualne

While starting pluginu mask we came on the problem.

This is the example.

Click on the mask example, and in the hotspot.

link.

While passing to the next panorama the virtual tour crashes. Plugin mask does not work correctly.

thanks for this bug note
I have fixed it now, I will upload tomorrow a updated package,

Quote from DorinDXN

About krprotect, I noticed that when .jpg tile are embedded into the big protected pano.swf the pano.swf seems to still need for the .jpeg files and give error if they aren't there i.e. if I have 6 cubic faces of 1 mb each the resulting protected pano.swf is over 6 mb large as one expects but still want the jpegs and gives error if they are missing. I used 1.0.8. beta 7 - win.

Hi, this can be a path problem, the embedded files are referenced by the same path like
in the original xml,
if the original xml file works, then the embedded should work too,

can you post the original xml file?
were the pano images added automatically in the kprotect tool after adding the xml?

best regards,
Klaus

Quote from CroHammeR

Wen i use old swfkrpanomousewheel.js file work. I found this differences Line 5:

Code

function krpmw_re(){var i=0;var cnt=SWFkrpanoMouseWheel.instances.length;for(i=0;i<cnt;i++){var objid=SWFkrpanoMouseWheel.instances[i].so.getAttribute('id');var obj=document[objid];if(obj){if (!SWFkrpanoMouseWheel.overobj){SWFkrpanoMouseWheel.overobj=objid;}if(SWFkrpanoMouseWheel.isSafari && !SWFkrpanoMouseWheel.isMac){if(obj.enable_mousewheel_js_bugfix){obj.enable_mousewheel_js_bugfix();}}else{obj.onmouseover=krpmw_ove;obj.onmouseout=krpmw_oue;}}}}


function krpmw_re(){var i=0;var cnt=SWFkrpanoMouseWheel.instances.length;for(i=0;i<cnt;i++){var objid=SWFkrpanoMouseWheel.instances[i].so.getAttribute('id');var obj=document[objid];if(obj){if(SWFkrpanoMouseWheel.isSafari && !SWFkrpanoMouseWheel.isMac){if(obj.enable_mousewheel_js_bugfix){obj.enable_mousewheel_js_bugfix();}}else{obj.onmouseover=krpmw_ove;obj.onmouseout=krpmw_oue;}}}}

Hi,

the upper one was the newer one,
was this the one that doesn't work?

Quote from DorinDXN

Hi Klaus, mistery is solved, while I launched the krprotect from beta7 folder, it keept and uses krpano.swf from beta6 folder , sorry!, my fault, I should check the setup tab first.

yes, this would explain the behavior, the beta6 wasn't able to load embedded data

Quote from Amedee

The DEC function seems to be broken:

Code

<action name="testcase">
 set(tst, 200);
 trace(tst before: , tst);
 dec(tst, 180);
 trace(tst after: , tst);
</action>

the variable tst will be set to -10000000000
Note that doing a 'inc -180' or a 'sub' will work as expected...

Hi,
thanks! you're right!
the default min/max limits were swapped for dec()

this would be the documentation for inc() and dec():

inc(var, byvalue*, maxvalue*, minvalue*);
dec(var, byvalue*, minvalue*, maxvalue*);

the "var" will be increased by "byvalue",
and if the "maxvalue" will be reached then it will be automatically
set to "minvalue", or if the "minvalue" will be reached then it will be set
to "maxvalue",
(the can be used to loop the value through in a defined range)

the default values are:
byvalue = 1
minvalue = -10000000000
maxvalue = +10000000000

and this min/max values were swapped
I will upload today a fixed version,

Quote from Amedee

The other issue is that the comparison operators '==' and 'EQ' always evaluate to 'false':

Code

<action name="testcase">
 set(tst, 200);
 trace(tst : , tst);
 if(tst EQ 200, trace(Test true), trace(Test false));
</action>

Will always trace False...

there is no "EQ" operator (I will add one )
but this should work:

if(tst == 200, trace(Test true), trace(Test false));

best regards,
Klaus

Hi,

I have uploaded a new bugfixed version:

Update - 2009-04-08:
- bugfix unloading mask
- bugfix dec()
- added the "EQ" if() operator (is the same like "==" )

best regards,
Klaus